Laws & Jurisprudence
MORAL DAMAGES
6:35 PM
Awarded to
enable the injured party to obtain means, diversions or amusement that will
serve to alleviate the moral suffering he has undergone by reason of the
defendant’s culpable action.
Moral damages (Art. 2217) include: MBA-SWS-PAF
(Master in Business Administration - Social Weather Station - Philipine Air Force)
by Justice Japar Dimaampao
Moral shock
Besmirched reputation
Anguish (mental)
Social humiliation
Wounded feelings
Similar injury
Physical suffering
Anxiety (serious)
Fright
The
plaintiff must allege and prove:
1.
The
factual basis for moral damages and
2.
The causal relation to the defendant’s act
Exception:
Moral damages may
be awarded to the victim in criminal proceedings without the need for pleading
of proof or the basis thereof.
Moral damages may
be recovered
in the following and analogous cases:
1.
A
criminal offense resulting in physical injuries;
2. Quasi‐delicts causing physical injuries;
3. Seduction,
abduction, rape, or other lascivious acts;
4. Adultery or
concubinage;
5. Illegal or
arbitrary detention or arrest;
6. Illegal search;
7. Libel, slander or
any other form of defamation;
8. Malicious
prosecution;
9. Acts mentioned in
Article 309; and
10. Actions referred to
in Articles 21, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, and 35. (Art. 2219, NCC)
To award moral
damages, a court must be satisfied with proof of the following:
1.
an
injury – whether physical, mental or psychological;
2. a culpable act or
omission factually established;
3. a wrongful act or
omission of the defendant as the proximate cause of the injury sustained by the
claimant;
4. the award of damages
predicated on any of the cases stated in Art. 2219.
Art.
2219, NCC speaks for criminal offense resulting from physical injuries and
quasi‐delicts causing physical injuries.
There
are instances wherein the plaintiff may
not prove the factual basis for moral damages as well as the causal relation
to the defendant’s act, like in criminal proceedings for rape. Subject to the
following requisites:
1.
There
must be an injury whether physical, mental or psychological, clearly sustained
by the claimant
2. There must be
culpable act or omission
3. Such act or
omission is the proximate cause of the injury
4. The damage is
predicated on the cases cited in Art. 2219
Furthermore,
in rape cases, is civil indemnity is different from moral damages. It is
distinct from and should not be denominated as moral damages which are based on
different jural foundations and assessed by the court in the exercise of sound
discretion (People v. Caldona, G.R. No. 126019, Mar. 1, 2001).
When
the fact of rape has been established, civil indemnity is mandatory. If it is
simple rape, civil indemnity is P50,000.00. If there is qualifying circumstance
as to justify the imposition of death penalty, it should be no less than
P75,000.00 (People v. Banago ; People v. Mahinay, G.R. No. 109613, July 17,
1995) (Pineda, p. 247, 2009 ed.).
Tortuous
acts
referred to in Articles 21, 26, 27, 28. 29, 32, 34 and 35 of the Civil Code,
wherein the plaintiff may recover moral damages
1.
Willful
acts contrary to morals, good customs or public policy
2. Disrespect to the
dignity, personality, privacy and peace of mind of neighbors and other persons
3. Refusal or neglect
of a public servant to perform his official duty without just cause
4. Unfair competition
in enterprise or in labor
5. Civil action for
damages against accused acquitted on reasonable doubt
6. Violation of civil
rights
7. Civil action for
damages against city or municipal police force
8. When the trial
court finds no reasonable ground to believe that a crime has been committed
after a preliminary investigation or when the prosecutor refuses or fails to
institute criminal proceedings.
Moral
and exemplary damages may not be granted if a marriage was dissolved on the ground of psychological incapacity.
As ruled in Buenaventura v. CA, G.R. No.
127358, Mar. 31, 2005, By declaring petitioner as psychologically
incapacitated, the possibility of awarding moral damages was negated, which
should have been proved by specific evidence that it was done deliberately.
Thus, as the grant of moral damages was not proper, it follows that the grant
of exemplary damages cannot stand since the Civil Code provides that exemplary
damages are imposed in addition to moral, temperate, liquidated or compensatory
damages. Finally, since the award of moral and exemplary damages is no longer
justified, the award of attorney's fees and expenses of litigation is left
without basis.
DISCLAIMER: The author is not lawyer nor an authority on this topic. It is a product of humble research and study of law. The information provided is not a legal advice and it should not be used as a substitute for a competent legal advice from a licensed lawyer.
0 comments